hubble

harry · Post by **harry** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:45 pm

Hello geckzilla

Is your interest in cosmology.

What is an intelligent response?

Who underwrites it?

Than why write stupid statements.

geckzilla · Post by **geckzilla** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:47 pm

Trust me, if I had a question, I would ask it. I don't. This is more like reading a book to me than participating in a conversation. I don't talk to books.

makc · Post by **makc** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 3:08 pm

...and I stopped reading books exactly because I cant talk to them

No, I do read if I'm sure that there is some info I am looking for, but no longer for the sake of reading itself. I can no longer enjoy it.

geckzilla · Post by **geckzilla** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:03 pm

I don't read either, and that was a mediocre analogy at best. Really, there are just some topics I have no input on but still like to read. Is that hard to understand?

My problem with harry is that he rarely, if ever, elucidates on anything. He acts passive aggressive rather and, if anything, obfuscates instead by being vague and condescending, acting like he knows something no one else here does but fails to impart this 'knowledge' on us with each post.

At least craterchains makes it clear that he only thinks we are stupid for not believing intelligent life makes crater chains though his posts have been reduced to a mere snap and string of capital o's and zeros lately.

Really, I can understand disagreeing with bits and pieces here and there and there really is wiggle room in almost any idea/theory/what have you but he seems to disagree with everything just because it's agreed upon by a majority like some damned hippie. Being different for the sake of being different? Take it to the art clubs. Otherwise you better be a fuckin genius with some awesome explanations that can be backed up with evidence.

makc · Post by **makc** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:50 pm

Not hard at all, I was just thinking if books could be made more interactive somehow... and I do not mean some tree of chained videos that stream upon click here and there, but book answering a question that reader might ask about its content. This would probably require some sofisticated programming... oh, sorry for offtopic

craterchains · Post by **craterchains** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 3:34 am

OOOOOOOO00OO00OOO00O0O0OOooOOOOO

harry · Post by **harry** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:30 am

Hello All

You said

My problem with harry is that he rarely, if ever, elucidates on anything. He acts passive aggressive rather and, if anything, obfuscates instead by being vague and condescending, acting like he knows something no one else here does but fails to impart this 'knowledge' on us with each post.

Smile,,,,,,,,,,,let me tell you.

The more I read the more I find that I know very little.

I'm very opened minded.

I have my opinion and respect others.

So tell me, What do you want me to discuss?[/quote]

orin stepanek · Post by **orin stepanek** » Wed Oct 24, 2007 4:11 pm

I'll say onething: Harry does kniow how to keep a thread going.

Orin

l3p3r · Post by **l3p3r** » Thu Oct 25, 2007 1:42 am

It keeps going alright! Round and round the same circle....

astro_uk · Post by **astro_uk** » Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:07 am

Yup, makes you wonder why he doesn't get either bored or frustrated.

Perhaps he is just one of those "intelligent" codes, designed to mimic human conversations by giving a standard response to any reply.

craterchains · Post by **craterchains** » Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:43 pm

Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet, Sock Puppet,

OOOO00OO00OO00Oo

makc · Post by **makc** » Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:51 pm

spammer spammer spammer

Doum · Post by **Doum** » Fri Oct 26, 2007 12:17 am

harry · Post by **harry** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:32 am

Hello All

And some say this is a Big Bang site.

THX1138 · Post by **THX1138** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:21 am

GOD · Post by **GOD** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:55 am

Nereid wrote:
GOD wrote:Quasars are not what scientists guess -- monstrous black holes. They are the results of what happens afterwards -- Big Bangs. There was (and will be) more than one Big Bang. The Big Bang we theorize was merely only a local affair in our part of the universe.
Welcome to The Asterisk*, GOD!

Do you have any scientific material that you'd care to share with us, concerning this idea of yours?

Not yet. However Hubble and currently unimagined tech. advances over the next ten years will provide such.

Starship Asterisk*

hubble

Re: What Quasars are