Comments and questions about the
APOD on the main view screen.
-
geckzilla
- Ocular Digitator
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
- Location: Modesto, CA
Post
by geckzilla » Sun Jan 31, 2016 5:13 am
Almost fooled myself into thinking there were two more linear, symmetrical structures emanating from the star. Just diffraction spikes.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.
-
Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18677
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Post
by Chris Peterson » Sun Jan 31, 2016 5:19 am
geckzilla wrote:Almost fooled myself into thinking there were two more linear, symmetrical structures emanating from the star. Just diffraction spikes.
I see the characteristic hexagonal Keck diffraction spikes on some of the outlying stars, but I don't see any obvious diffraction spikes around the central star of the nebula. What are you seeing?
-
geckzilla
- Ocular Digitator
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:42 pm
- Location: Modesto, CA
Post
by geckzilla » Sun Jan 31, 2016 5:31 am
Chris Peterson wrote:geckzilla wrote:Almost fooled myself into thinking there were two more linear, symmetrical structures emanating from the star. Just diffraction spikes.
I see the characteristic hexagonal Keck diffraction spikes on some of the outlying stars, but I don't see any obvious diffraction spikes around the central star of the nebula. What are you seeing?
Presumably the last pair is also there but lined up with one of the lines forming the cross of the Red Square.
square_spikes.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Just call me "geck" because "zilla" is like a last name.
-
Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18677
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Post
by Chris Peterson » Sun Jan 31, 2016 5:37 am
geckzilla wrote:Chris Peterson wrote:geckzilla wrote:Almost fooled myself into thinking there were two more linear, symmetrical structures emanating from the star. Just diffraction spikes.
I see the characteristic hexagonal Keck diffraction spikes on some of the outlying stars, but I don't see any obvious diffraction spikes around the central star of the nebula. What are you seeing?
Presumably the last pair is also there but lined up with one of the lines forming the cross of the Red Square.
square_spikes.jpg
Ah, nice catch. I agree (and also that there is another pair lost in the actual structure).
-
Boomer12k
- :---[===] *
- Posts: 2691
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:07 am
Post
by Boomer12k » Sun Jan 31, 2016 6:38 am
Arrrgh, matey...X marks the spot....
:---[===] *
-
mollwollfumble
- Asternaut
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 4:10 pm
Post
by mollwollfumble » Sun Jan 31, 2016 10:18 am
> A leading progenitor hypothesis for the square nebula ...
The red square nebula is not at all well understood. The reason for this is the physical and spectroscopic similarity to the red rectangle nebula, which is not understood at all. The spectrum of light arriving at Earth absorbed by the interstellar medium contains absorption lines from "diffuse interstellar bands". Continual research into the spectrum of diffuse interstellar bands has not reached anything like a consensus, with umpteen possibilities including modified buckyballs, unusual anthracenes and metal-organic dust grains. Searches for similar spectra elsewhere found only one match - the red rectangle. That makes the red rectangle unique, definitely not similar to other planetary nebulae. The red square also shares spectral details with the red rectangle, which makes it the second closest match to the "diffuse interstellar bands".
As a result, the red square should not be considered to be closely related to other planetary nebulae, it's too weird.
-
Dennis Moore
Post
by Dennis Moore » Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:04 am
I've seen a square cooling tower that had a water sprayer that emitted a square pattern. I'd start there.
-
JohnD
- Tea Time, Guv! Cheerio!
- Posts: 1593
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 2:11 pm
- Location: Lancaster, England
Post
by JohnD » Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:33 am
Could this be a 'visible pulsar"?
As a pulsar is thought to be a stellar remnant with a fast spin and precession, so that its jets rotate like a lighthouse beam, what if those jets were not only radio emissions, but gas ionised to glow or illuminated by the star? The jets would form a cone on either side of the star, and if the angle of precession were 45 degrees would appear as a square when seen in side view.
The same argument would serve to explain supernova 1987A, if the jets there were intermittent. And must have been in place before the supernova, if that occurred in 1987, and the Hubble picture from 1994 showed rings so far from an object 150MLY away.
John
-
lisawoody
Post
by lisawoody » Sun Jan 31, 2016 3:05 pm
Why isn't light distortion due to coming from behind a black hole considered as part of the symmetry of what we are seeing?
-
Chris Peterson
- Abominable Snowman
- Posts: 18677
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: Guffey, Colorado, USA
Post
by Chris Peterson » Sun Jan 31, 2016 3:10 pm
lisawoody wrote:Why isn't light distortion due to coming from behind a black hole considered as part of the symmetry of what we are seeing?
A black hole is too small to appreciably distort light, except when seen from very close. At the scale of this image, a black hole would be smaller than a pixel. When we see gravitational lensing, it is caused by the combined mass of entire galaxies or galaxy clusters, consisting mostly of dark matter, which bend much, much more distant light. This is a nearby nebula.
-
JohnD
- Tea Time, Guv! Cheerio!
- Posts: 1593
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 2:11 pm
- Location: Lancaster, England
Post
by JohnD » Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:18 pm
Somehow, I got to this object, ppreviously featired on APOD:
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap020618.html and
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap000416.html
A
cylinder of glowing gas at Nebula IC 4066, with maybe an originator star visible at its centre.
Could the mechanism I susggest above make this too, if the star with jets were in orbit around another object? This video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jT_T0xxRqKQ demonstrates how this would sculpt a cylinder around the two stars, as the jets describe smaller circles around them. I see that the video suggest that with time the orbiting pulsar would move towards its partner, and tilt its axis of rotation, which would tend to make the cylinder radius smaller at one end and larger at the other. I've no reply to that as a criticism of the theory, ecedpt to suggest that the system hasn't been in existence long enough?
John
-
ta152h0
- Schooled
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 12:46 am
- Location: Auburn, Washington, USA
Post
by ta152h0 » Sun Jan 31, 2016 9:46 pm
and I thought this was a better image of Proxima Centauri. A faint attempt at guessing prior to reading the APOD
Wolf Kotenberg
-
Jim S
Post
by Jim S » Mon Feb 01, 2016 1:21 am
This reminds me of the shape that Tom Noddy develops when he blows a "square bubble."
See
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=np4n5PPIa38 at about the 4 minute mark.
///Jim\\\