mdione wrote: ↑Wed Jan 04, 2023 10:11 pm
Yes, I don't deny it is useful, what I'm saying is that it shouldn't be in the RSS feed, specially since it doesn't have a declared date.
Moreover, I think the initial requirements for an RSS feed adressed this:
OgetayK wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 9:35 pm
mdione wrote: ↑Wed Jan 04, 2023 8:53 am
- Entries are not dated, so less data for the clients to resolve the above issue.
The lack of timestamps for entries is a big deal in general
, not just for the above issue. My RSS feed reader is displaying all entries as having been published on Jan 01.
The current RSS feed (https://apod.nasa.gov/apod.rss
) also fails to meet another requirement, taken from Flipboard (https://ko-kr.about.flipboard.com/rss-guidelines/
The entire body copy of your article, not just headlines and summaries.
This feed (https://apod.me/en.rss
), from the Arabic APOD mirror (https://apod.me/
), seems to address all
of these issues.